MORMON PUBLIC RELATIONS EFFORT VIA FULLER SEMINARY
Mormon church refuses to change bad doctrines after hearing the true Gospel.
Dick Mouw is determined to dance with the Devil as he prays in Satan's house!
LDS should talk more about doctrine, evangelical leader advises
By Peggy Fletcher Stack
The Salt Lake Tribune
07/04/2008
Mormon leaders should take to heart the bruising lessons Mitt Romney's
presidential campaign taught them about their faith's image and open a public
dialogue about LDS theology, the president of Fuller Theological Seminary says.
Now that Romney is out of the race, LDS leaders can comment on the "distorted
characterizations of Mormon thought," Richard Mouw wrote in Beliefnet, a
national online magazine about religion. They could also give their "official
blessings" to the ongoing discussions between evangelical theologians and Mormon
scholars that could help clarify "those elements of Mormon thought that are most
susceptible to criticism from the perspective of traditional Christianity."
Such an endorsement would help Evangelicals, too, Mouw argues.
"The LDS leadership has a marvelous opportunity right now to invite Evangelicals
and Mormons to learn together how to be better neighbors," he says.
Mormon officials responded to Mouw's suggestion with a broad, but vague
statement.
Leaders of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints "welcome those
efforts. . .and look forward to continued friendly association and dialogue with
Dr. Mouw and with others of goodwill," LDS spokesman Scott Trotter said. "The
church embraces as an article of faith the concept of respect for other
religions and the freedom to choose, and urges its own members to avoid
misrepresentation or mischaracterizations of the beliefs of others."
Not all Mormons think Mouw's proposal is feasible.
The differences between Evangelicals and Mormons is more than theological, says
Kathleen Flake, who teaches American religious history at Vanderbilt University.
It's also organizational and systematic.
Evangelicals are only loosely organized around a set of principles; not least
emphasizing the primacy of the Bible over theology, Flake says. Latter-day
Saints, on the other hand, "are tightly organized around an enlarged canon of
Bible-based narratives. These are loosely employed to express personal
conviction of God's contemporary and revelatory immediacy."
Mouw's invitation for official, Vatican II-like negotiation makes sense, she
says, "only if you think that Evangelicals and Latter-day Saints have a theology
sufficiently systematized to speak definitively. It seems to me that neither
does."
Talking is good, Flake says, "but it's never going to be official, only
academic."
That may be likely given that the first conversations began in a university
setting.
About a decade ago, Mouw and some colleagues visited Brigham Young University to
discuss questions of authority, revelation, becoming gods, faith and works,
grace and Jesus' atoning sacrifice for humanity with BYU religion professor Bob
Millet. Millet later went to Mouw's turf at Fuller in Pasadena, Calif. These
conversations continue to this day and now involve dozens of others. Last year,
an expanded group met in Nauvoo, Ill., a historic location dear to the LDS
faithful.
"They've been good discussions," Mouw said in a phone interview. "We really
disagree about things but at the same time, we have gotten to a place where
there's trust between us."
In a 2004 speech before a packed audience in the Mormon Tabernacle on Temple
Square, Mouw chastised his fellow Evangelicals for sinning against Latter-day
Saints by misrepresenting their views to others in order to debunk Mormonism.
"It's a terrible thing to bear false witness," Mouw said. "We've told you what
you believe without first asking you. . .I remain convinced there are serious
issues of difference that are of eternal consequence, but now we can discuss
them as friends."
Though some people on both sides of the divide took his advice to heart, Mouw
saw the same kind of misrepresentation emerge during Romney's run for the
presidency.
The problem, as he sees it, is that few people know much about what Mormons
believe and Mormons often don't explain their deep doctrine to outsiders.
"The element of mystery generates a feeling of suspicion," he said.