AVOID MUSLIM EGYPT
Egypt’s Islamic Research Center Wants Christian TV Off Air
Joseph Mayton
29 December 2011
Bikyamasr.com
CAIRO: Egypt’s Islamic Research Center, led by Sheikh of al-Azhar Ahmed al-Tayeb, is demanding that United States Christian television station al-Karma of insulting Islam and inciting religious violence in the country.
The offshoot of the Sunni Islamic world’s leading religious institution has also demanded that it be taken off air over what it described as “offensive” material directed at Muslims, daily al-Ahram newspaper reported on Thursday.
The Karma television channel is broadcasted into Egypt by the country’s state-run NileSat, thus making a potential case against the channel easier to ultimately remove the channel from Egyptian households.
The channel, however, is not among the most watched in Egypt, even among the Christian population.
“I have never heard of it, so maybe it isn’t really a big thing, but if al-Azhar is trying to attack it then who knows,” said Noha Fahmy, a young Coptic Christian woman living in Cairo. “To be honest, the more these kind of lawsuits happen the more divisions it will create,” she told Bikyamasr.com.
The Christian community in Egypt, predominantly Coptic Christian, account for some 10 percent of Egypt’s 80 million population and have long demanded better treatment and an end to what they have called “marginalization” by the majority Muslim population.
On October 9, thousands of Christians took to the streets in Cairo after a series of church attacks in the south of the country demanding greater rights. The military opened fire on the protesters and ran them over with armored vehicles outside the state television building in what has become known as the “Maspero Massacre.”
At
least 27 people were killed in the violence, which the military claims
was not done by their soldiers, despite video online showing the
opposite.
From Arab Spring to Coptic Winter: Sectarian Violence and the Struggle for Democratic Transition in Egypt
Testimony
Michael H. Posner
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor
Helsinki Commission Hearing
Washington, DC
November 15, 2011
Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for conducting this important hearing on the
situation faced by Coptic Christian community in Egypt, and for
inviting me to testify.
As you know, this is a time of substantial transition in Egypt as
Egyptians strive to move their country towards democracy. This is not
an easy process and it will not happen overnight. Egypt is only
starting on a path from the temporary stewardship of the Supreme
Council of the Armed Forces (SCAF), through parliamentary elections
that will begin in two weeks, then the process of drafting of a new
constitution and finally presidential elections. As they move toward
these milestones, millions of Egyptians hope to see the emergence of a
democratic civilian government that respects the universal rights of
all of its citizens.
As part of this vision, it is vital that there be a place in the new Egypt for all citizens, including all religious minorities, of which the Coptic Christian community is the largest. President Obama and Secretary Clinton have made clear their deep concern about violence against Coptic Christians, most recently during the October 9 tragedy in front of the Egyptian radio and television building in the Maspiro area of Cairo. At least 25 people died and more than 300 were injured. We have urged the Egyptian government to investigate this violence, including allegations that the military and police used excessive force that was the cause of most of the demonstrator deaths. We also have urged that those responsible for these deaths and injuries be held accountable.
While the focus of my testimony is on the situation of the Copts, I would like to point out that other religious minorities also suffer official discrimination. While non-Muslim religious minorities officially recognized by the government – namely Christians and the tiny Jewish community – generally worship without harassment, members of the Bahai Faith, which the government does not recognize, face personal and collective discrimination. The government also sometimes arrests, detains, and harasses Muslims such as Shia, Ahmadiya, and Quranist, converts from Islam to Christianity, and members of other religious groups, such as Jehovah’s Witnesses and Mormons. The Government continues to refuse to recognize conversions of Muslims to Christianity or other religions, which constitutes a prohibition in practice.
I would like to set this testimony on the Copts in a broader context. Last week Secretary Clinton gave an important policy address in which she outlined our overall policy on democratization in the Middle East and beyond. She described the US government’s principled engagement in the Middle East. We support the aspirations of citizens to live in societies that guarantee freedom, including freedom of expression, assembly and religion. We also believe strongly in systems that allow citizens a say in how they are governed and that will provide economic opportunities for all. These are the demands that we heard in Tahrir Square, where Copts and Muslims joined hands to protest and to pray in the weeks leading up to the downfall of the Mubarak regime. We have heard similar demands echoing throughout the Middle East and even far beyond that region in the ensuing months.
Secretary Clinton also has spoken out consistently about the importance of religious freedom and religious tolerance, both of which are fundamental to human dignity and peaceful transitions to democracy. Religious freedom is a human right, guaranteed by international human rights law. At the release of the State Department’s report on International Religious Freedom in September, Secretary Clinton emphasized the role that religious freedom and tolerance play in building stable and harmonious societies. She said:
“Hatred and intolerance are destabilizing. When governments crack down on religious expression, when politicians or public figures try to use religion as a wedge issue, or when societies fail to take steps to denounce religious bigotry and curb discrimination based on religious identity, they embolden extremists and fuel sectarian strife. And the reverse is also true: When governments respect religious freedom, when they work with civil society to promote mutual respect, or when they prosecute acts of violence against members of religious minorities, they can help turn down the temperature. They can foster a public aversion to hateful speech without compromising the right to free expression. And in doing so, they create a climate of tolerance that helps make a country more stable, more secure, and more prosperous.”
This is the basis for our belief that in order to succeed and prosper, Egypt, and its neighbors, must protect the rights of all citizens and all minorities, including its Coptic population. The corollary is also true: successful democratic transitions are the best way to safeguard those rights.
Mr. Chairman, the Copts in Egypt have faced discrimination for many years. Christians face personal and collective discrimination, especially in government employment and the ability to build, renovate, and repair places of worship.
Although they represent about 10% of the population and play an important role in Egypt’s economy, Copts have suffered from widespread discrimination and remain underrepresented in prominent positions in Egyptian politics and society.
The headlines – and the trend lines – continue to tell a disturbing story.
I was in Egypt just days after the January 2010 attack on the Nag Hammadi Church in Upper Egypt, when gunmen shot and killed seven people as worshippers were leaving a midnight Christmas mass. At that time, I called for an end to impunity for such crimes and full accountability for those who attacked this holy place. One suspect, Hamam al-Kamouny was tried under the emergency law in a state security court, convicted on January 16 and executed on October 10. The other two defendants, Qoraishi Abul Haggag and Hendawi El-Sayyed, were acquitted by the court, angering many Coptic activists. Yesterday, November 14, Egypt’s official news agency announced that Abol-Haggag and El-Sayyed are to be retried on December 19 under the Higher Emergency State Security Court, for crimes including premeditated murder and terrorism with the use of force and violence. We applaud the pursuit of accountability in this case, although we would prefer that these types of crimes be dealt with in civilian courts with full due process of law.
Almost exactly a year after the Nag Hammadi attack, on January 1, 2011, a bomb exploded at the Coptic Orthodox Church of the Two Saints in Alexandria, killing 23 people and wounding around 100. There are no suspects in custody for that crime, although the Government of Egypt reports that its investigation is ongoing.
These two incidents, and others like them, took place before the fall of President Mubarak on February 11. We have since received reports of an increase in sectarian violence and tensions, including at least 67 people killed in religious clashes – most of them Coptic Christians. This brings the total number of reported deaths this year to more than 90. There have been at least six recent major incidents of violence against Copts:
o On February 23, the Army used live ammunition, including rocket propelled grenades, against unarmed Copts during a land dispute at a monastery. A monk, one of the six shot, later died. To our knowledge, no one has been held accountable for these attacks.
o On March 4, in the village of Sol, a large group of Muslim villagers destroyed the Church of Saint Mina and St. George after the army failed to stop them. To our knowledge, there has been no investigation and no one has been charged despite videos of the perpetrators.
o On March 8, 13 people were killed when Muslims and Copts clashed in the Mukkatum area of Cairo. Some of the Copts had been protesting the slow government response to the destruction of the church in Sol. One Coptic bishop claimed that though news reports listed seven Christians and six Muslims. To our knowledge, there has been no investigation and no one has been charged in the deaths.
o On May 8 in Imbaba, a poor neighborhood of Cairo, two churches were attacked and one burned during sectarian riots. The clashes resulted in 23 deaths and 232 injuries. That month, the official media reported that the government referred 48 suspects to trial. Approximately half of these suspects have been arrested, including a prominent Salafist leader, while half remain at large. The High State Security Court in Giza has adjourned the trial until December 4, when it expects to hear testimony from the remaining witnesses.
o On September 30, in Merinab village in Edfu, Aswan governorate, an estimated crowd of 3,000 Muslims looted and burned the St. George Coptic Orthodox Church, in addition to some Copt-owned homes and businesses, following reported incitement by village imams. Local media reported that a Ministry of Justice fact-finding committee traveled to Aswan on October 12, in the aftermath of the Maspiro violence, to investigate the church burning. The status of this investigation is unclear.
o And finally, on October 9 in Cairo, violence erupted in front of the Egyptian television building known as Maspiro, at a demonstration by Copts protesting the government’s failure to investigate the burning of the church in Merinab in Aswan governorate. At least twenty-five people were killed and more than 300 injured.
On October 11, Secretary Clinton addressed the October 9 violence at Maspiro and called for an immediate, credible, and transparent investigation of all who were responsible for the violence, with full due process of law. The White House issued a statement urging Egyptians to move forward together to forge a strong and united Egypt and reaffirming our belief that the rights of minorities - including Copts - must be respected, and that all people have the universal rights of peaceful protest and religious freedom.
The government of Egypt has stated publicly that they are conducting two investigations. The Egyptian Armed Forces are reviewing the conduct of Military Police, who eyewitnesses and video evidence suggest ran over and shot at demonstrators. The Ministry of Justice has been tasked by the Egyptian Cabinet with a full investigation of the incident. Separately, military prosecutors are investigating about 30 demonstrators, including one prominent blogger, who were detained during the violence. They are accused of inciting violence, stealing firearms, and attacking security forces. They will be tried in military courts.
On November 2, a fact-finding committee established by the National Council for Human Rights issued an initial report on the Maspiro violence. (NCHR is a quasi-governmental watchdog body, but the committee was led by respected human rights advocates). The report found that the march by Copts and their Muslim allies began peacefully at Shubra and moved toward Maspiro in downtown Cairo. According to the report and several corroborating accounts, as the marchers approached Maspiro, they were attacked by civilians throwing rocks and chanting Muslim extremist slogans. According to the same sources, military police then confronted the marchers and attempted to keep them from reaching the building. The MPs used shields and batons, and fired blanks. Marchers began fighting back against the violent civilians and military police. The NCHR report acknowledged that 12 or more civilians were killed when they were run over by military vehicles. The committee said it could not determine who fired the bullets that killed at least seven demonstrators.
During the height of the clashes, state TV anchor Rasha Magdy called on "honorable Egyptians" to defend the Army against "attacks by violent demonstrators." Twenty-one prominent Egyptian human right organizations criticized the “inflammatory role played by the official state media,” charging that a “direct link can be traced between the outright incitement against demonstrators by state media and the events at Maspiro.”
On October 13, the head of Egypt’s military justice system, Adel al-Morsi, said that the military would lead the official investigation into the events. According to Human Rights Watch and local media, the military has arrested approximately 30 individuals. The government has said it will try suspects in military courts, since the crimes involved attacks on military personnel and equipment.
The Coptic community is concerned, as we are, about the severity and frequency of sectarian attacks against their community, and while they recognize that the government has nothing to do with most of these attacks, they are greatly concerned about the need to hold perpetrators accountable. I want to make clear that most of these clashes have involved both Copts and Muslims, and members of both communities have been the perpetrators and victims of the violence. It also is important to emphasize that many Muslims have stood up to defend members of the Coptic community against extremist violence.
The United States Government condemns this sectarian violence and continues to urge the Government of Egypt to take all necessary and available measures to reduce these tensions.
In raising our concerns about the Coptic community, we are also aware and very supportive of the positive steps the Egyptian government has taken on behalf of the Copts. On March 8, by order of the Prime Minister, Coptic priest Mitaus Wahba was released from prison where he was serving a five year sentence for officiating at a wedding of a Christian convert from Islam. On April 14, the SCAF fulfilled its commitment to rebuild a church in Sol that had been destroyed on March 4 by mob violence. And as I noted earlier, the government also took steps in response to the May 8 Imbaba violence; in addition to re-opening dozens of churches, the government is prosecuting 48 individuals charged with murder, attempted murder, and a variety of other crimes. The trial is scheduled to resume on December 4.
The government also has pledged to adopt a Unified Places of Worship Law, which would guarantee all faiths the ability to construct and maintain places of worship. The Cabinet sent the draft law to the military council in October. We urge the SCAF to endorse this provision as soon as possible. The Government of Egypt has promised to consider this measure for several years, including twice in the last five months. Numerous cases of sectarian violence in recent years have stemmed from disputes over church construction. The prompt adoption of this provision now would send a very strong signal of the government’s commitment to protect religious freedom. It would recognize the right of all Egyptians to freely build places of worship they need to conduct religious activities. As the government reviews this proposal it should take into account the concerns expressed over earlier drafts that the suggested multi-stage process of applying for permits to construct and repair churches is too convoluted, cedes too much authority to governors to grant permits, and imposes onerous restrictions on the number and location of houses of worship.
Finally, in the aftermath of the Maspiro violence, we welcome steps that are being taken by the Government of Egypt to reduce discrimination in the penal codes. On October 15, the SCAF issued a decree amending Egypt's penal code to prohibit discrimination on the basis of religion, gender, language, faith, or race. The decree also delineated prison sentences and specific fines for acts of discrimination, as well as failure to prevent discrimination. These included more severe penalties for government officials found to be complicit in discrimination.
The new penal code provisions bolster the Egyptian constitution’s ban on discrimination. Article 7 of the March 31, 2011, constitutional declaration states that "all citizens are equal before the law. They have equal public rights and duties without discrimination on the grounds of race, ethnic origin, language, religion, or creed." We urge the government to enforce these and other anti-discrimination laws and hold violators accountable so that all minorities, including Copts, can enjoy equal protection.
Like Egyptian Muslims, Egyptian Copts are concerned about their country’s future and their own place in it. In addition to security from sectarian violence and equal treatment under the law, they want equal representation in parliament and a proportional voice on the committee that will draft Egypt’s new constitution. Like moderate Egyptian Muslims, the vast majority of whom support religious freedom, Copts and other religious minorities consider themselves full partners in a new Egypt.
As Secretary Clinton said last week, “If – over time – the most powerful political force in Egypt remains a roomful of unelected officials, they will have planted the seeds for future unrest, and Egyptians will have missed a historic opportunity.” The door to real democratic change is only beginning to open. We hope Egyptians will walk through it together to a more peaceful and prosperous future.
Thank you.
Coptic Christians protest outside White House against violence in Egypt
The Washington Post
By Pamela Constable,
October 19, 2011
Hoisting homemade wooden crosses and photographs of bodies they said were crushed by tanks, hundreds of Coptic Christians rallied Wednesday in front of the White House to protest rising violence against minority Christians in Egypt and to demand that the Obama administration pressure Cairo to protect their rights.
The
demonstrators, mostly Egyptian immigrants who traveled in buses from as
far as New York and Chicago, included black-robed Coptic orthodox
priests and families who had lost relatives in recent violence in
Egypt, including the New Year’s Eve bombing of a church and a bloody
clash Oct. 9 between protesters and army forces in Cairo that left 27
people dead.
“It is like a horrible nightmare. We watch on TV and see our people
being run over by tanks,” said Mary Wassef, 66, who took a bus with
friends from her church in northern New Jersey. “This is my church and
my homeland. But now they want to force all Christians to convert or
leave. If you hang a cross in your car, they pull you out and smash you
to pieces.”
Christians in Egypt are a deeply rooted minority of about 10 million in a largely Muslim society of 81 million. Long-simmering tensions between the two groups have escalated since January, when a popular uprising in Cairo led to the fall of longtime ruler Hosni Mubarak but left the country in a state of political turmoil.
Many Christians in the Egyptian American diaspora of about half a million, scattered across a dozen states, have expressed concern that radical Islamist groups are seeking to dominate the post-revolutionary scene and to turn Egypt into a Sunni theocracy. Some placards at the rally Wednesday warned of an “Islamic jihad” against Christians.
The demonstrators also expressed fear that the Egyptian army, a longtime bulwark of Mubarak’s power, is becoming a repressive force against Christians. Many held up bloody photos of crushed torsos and limbs, which they said had been deliberately run over by tanks Oct. 9. Hundreds chanted “shame on the army” and called for the ouster of its national commander, Field Marshal Mohammed Hussein Tantawi.
“We Christians have faced Islamic oppression for 1,400 years, but now it is getting much more ugly,” said Ghada Nasr, 35, a small business owner from Newark, Del., whose parents live in Egypt. “The army should be protecting people, not crushing them. Our religion is peaceful, but it is time for us to act.”
Traditionally,
leaders of the Coptic church in Egypt have tried to avoid provoking
Egyptian authorities. The rally Wednesday was peaceful, and protesters
interspersed chants for justice with hymns calling for God’s mercy in
Arabic, English and ancient Coptic. Organizers said the presence of
numerous senior Coptic priests — several gray-bearded, one in a
wheelchair — had the blessing of their orthodox pope in Cairo.
“We need an Egyptian Martin Luther King to lead our people to freedom,”
said George Ibrahim, 66, a retired civil engineer who emigrated from
Egypt in the 1940s and lives in Ashburn. Unlike Copts in Egypt, who
have long been ostracized, many of those who came to the United States
are well established, successful professionals. In the greater
Washington area, many work for the federal government.
A major demand of the demonstrators was that the Obama administration, which has continued the long U.S. alliance with Egypt and provides it with hundreds of millions of dollars in financial aid each year, pressure Cairo by conditioning further assistance to improvements in human rights and religious freedom.
“If we are calling them an ally, then we should not be paying with U.S. taxpayers’ money for bullets and weapons that are being used to oppress Christians,” said Michael Ruzek, 30, a medical doctor from New Jersey who attended the rally. Protesters placed a row of black wooden coffins along the sidewalk in front of the White House.
An advocacy group called Coptic Solidarity, which helped organize the rally, also called for an impartial investigation into the Oct. 9 violence, prosecution of official perpetrators, and full enactment of a bill that Congress passed in July that would create a U.S. envoy to the Middle East for religious minorities.
The circumstances of the Oct. 9 clashes in Cairo, in which Christian and Muslim protesters were involved in hours of battles with police and troops, remain confused. The day after the incident, White House spokesman Jay Carney said that President Obama was “deeply concerned” about the violence and “believes that the rights of minorities, including Copts, must be respected,” but he stopped short of blaming the government and called for “restraint on all sides.”
Why
Egypt Is Descending Into Sectarian Strife And Lawlessness
Grace Wyler
May 17, 2011
Businessinsider.com
Nearly 100 days after the fall of President Hosni Mubarek, the fate of Egypt's Arab Spring uprising remains unclear. Recent attacks against Egypt's Coptic Christian community that left hundreds dead highlight the insecurity and sectarian violence that has clouded the spirit of the Tahrir Square revolution.
Blogging for the New York Review of Books, Yasmine El Rashidi gives the most illuminating report we've read so far of Egypt's descent into sectarianism and the factors in play during Egypt's chaotic political transition.
In her eyewitness account, El Rashidi points out that the attacks against Coptic Christians reflect longstanding discrimination against the Copts, which account for about 10% of Egypt's population. Under Mubarek, persecution against the Copts subsided and conditions improved. At the same time, however, his regime was increasingly lenient towards Egypt's Salafist sect.
She writes:
"Since Mubarak’s resignation on February 11, hardline Salafis —who were kept under tight control by the former regime—have become vocal opponents of the church. Although they command only a small fraction of the followers of the mainstream Muslim Brotherhood, the Salafis’ brand of purist Islam is popular among some in conservative and working class districts, where there is growing resentment that the revolution hasn’t brought any tangible benefits...In some areas, Salafi Sheikhs have been using their Friday sermons to incite violence against Copts, whom they regard as infidels, and preach against democracy, which they say is not compatible with their goal of establishing an Islamic State."
But while Salafists have been the most obvious instigators of the recent attacks on Egypt's Coptic churches, El Rashidi notes that a broader variety of groups appear to have a hand in encouraging the violence.
El Rashidi concludes that a confluence of interests - including the ruling military council's desire to consolidate power, radical Islamists attempts impose sharia law and elements of the ancien regime looking to foment instability - have created an extremely insecure situation for Egypt's minorities.
In the face of growing economic uncertainty and political chaos, the situation is likely to get much worse.
Cairo mob brutally assaulted CBS reporter Lara Logan
By Michael Winter, USA TODAY
Feb 15, 2011
A mob in Tahrir Square brutally beat and sexually assaulted CBS News' chief foreign correspondent, Lara Logan, who was covering Friday's celebration of the departure of former president Hosni Mubarak, the network says. She is in a U.S. hospital recovering.
CBS says Logan, who was reporting for 60 Minutes, was surrounded by more than 200 people "whipped into frenzy." She then became separated from her TV crew and security and then suffered a "brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating." She was saved by a group of women and about 20 Egyptian soldiers, and reconnected with her colleagues CBS says. Saturday she flew back to the United States and is now in a hospital. The network said it would have no further comment.
The Washington Post notes that 39-year-old Logan, who joined CBS in 2002, is the mother of two young children. She met her husband, Joe Burkett, a defense contractor, in Baghdad while covering the war.
The attack highlights the risks female journalists face, The Atlantic's Garance Franke-Ruta writes.
Most mainstream American news outlets have a policy of not naming the survivors of sexual assault and it is hard to imagine that CBS would have issued this statement, which landed like a thunderbolt in the close-knit media world, without Logan's permission. That makes her one very brave woman, as news of the attack ricocheted across Twitter and newspapers with lightning speed.
Bomb Kills 21, Injures 79 at Coptic New Year's Mass in Alexandria, Egypt
By - Jan 1, 2011
Bloomberg
At least 21 people were killed and 79 wounded when a bomb exploded outside a Coptic Christian church in the Mediterranean city of Alexandria in the deadliest terrorist attack in Egypt since at least 2006.
The blast occurred after midnight as worshipers were leaving a New Year’s service, damaging the church, a nearby mosque and cars on the street, the Interior Ministry said in a statement on its website. “Foreign elements” appear to have been responsible for the blast, the ministry said, adding that it has increased security around churches nationwide “in light of the escalating threats from al-Qaeda to many countries.”
Al-Qaeda’s branch in Iraq said in November it would attack Christian targets after it claimed Egypt’s Coptic Church was holding two Christian women who had converted to Islam. The Church has denied this charge. No group has claimed responsibility for today’s blast.
The attack bears the “fingerprints” of al-Qaeda, said Amr El-Shobaki, an expert on Islamist groups at the Cairo-based Al Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies. “It was either successful in planting a cell in Egypt or recruited individuals to carry out a single operation,” he said.
“This will deepen the tension between Muslims and Christians in Egypt, El-Shobaki said in a phone interview. Confrontations between the two communities have increased for several years.
‘Cut Off the Hand’
Analysts have previously said that they didn’t see signs of an organized presence in Egypt by Islamic extremist groups such as al Qaeda, whose top deputy leader, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, is Egyptian.
Police waged a war with Islamist militants, mainly in southern Egypt, during the 1990s. In 1997, militants killed more than 60 tourists in the ancient city of Luxor, sparking a security crackdown that brought attacks to a halt.
That respite ended with a series of bombings from 2004 to 2006 targeting resorts in the Sinai peninsula, killing more than 100 Egyptian and foreign tourists. The three attacks in Sinai, which police blamed on a previously unknown local group, occurred on the eve of national holidays. More than 20 people died in a 2006 bombing in the resort of Dahab, a year after more than 60 were killed in a similar incident in Sharm El-Sheikh.
The explosion in Alexandria was likely carried out by a suicide bomber who was also killed in the blast, the Interior Ministry said.
Suicide Bomber
“It has been confirmed that the epicenter of the blast wasn’t in one of the cars or the road, which makes it likely that the device was carried by a suicide man who was killed with the rest,” the ministry said.
President Hosni Mubarak, in a televised speech today, vowed to find those responsible for the attack. “We will cut off the hand of terrorism,” he said.
“You are making a grave mistake if you think that you will be spared the punishment of Egyptians,” Mubarak said, addressing the perpetrators.
The blast badly damaged other cars on the street, television footage showed. Scores of Copts, encircled by security forces, gathered before the church to protest the attack.
In January 2010, six Christians were killed in a drive-by shooting outside a church in southern Egypt, and in November police killed a protester during clashes with Copts triggered by a halt to the construction of a church.
Copts
Copts account for about 10 percent of Egypt’s population of 80 million people. The Coptic Orthodox Church was founded in Alexandria in the first century by Mark, one of the apostles of Jesus. After an Arab army conquered Egypt in the seventh century, Islam gradually became the country’s dominant religion.
Tensions between the two communities, reported in the government-controlled and independent press, have been building for several years. In 2004, Christians in Cairo claimed that the wife of a Coptic priest was forced to convert to Islam. After a riot in which 50 people were injured, the government ordered her returned to her Coptic family. In 2005, Muslims in Alexandria demonstrated against a DVD in which a Coptic youth converts to Islam and then changes his mind.
In late 2008, riots erupted in Ain Shams, a district of Cairo, after Copts renovated a former underwear factory and held mass there.
Egypt, set to hold presidential election in September, relies on tourism as a key source for foreign currency along with foreign direct investment and revenue from the Suez Canal.
Tourism accounts for 13 percent of jobs in the Arab country. The government aims to attract 16 million tourists in 2011, bringing in $14 billion in revenue, Tourism Minister Zoheir Garranah said in an interview in October.
“If there is any negative impact on tourism it will be in the short-term,” Alia Mamdouh, an economist at Cairo-based investment bank CI Capital, said by telephone.
Egypt Cuts a Deal: Christians Fed to Muslim 'Lions'
by Raymond Ibrahim
Hudson New York
October 18, 2010
A prominent Egyptian, Muhammad Salim al-Awwa, ex-secretary general of the International Union for Muslim Scholars, appeared on Al Jazeera on September 15, and, in a wild tirade, accused the Copts of "stocking arms and ammunition in their churches and monasteries" — arms imported from Israel, no less, as "Israel is in the heart of the Coptic Cause" — and "preparing to wage war against Muslims."
He warned that if nothing is done, the "country will burn," and urged Muslims to "counteract the strength of the [Coptic] Church." Al-Awwa further charged that Egypt's security forces cannot enter the monasteries to investigate for weapons — an amazing assertion, considering that Coptic monasteries are not only at the mercy of the state, but easy prey to Islamist/Bedouin attacks.
Needless to say, these remarks have inflamed Muslim passions, not to mention paranoia, against Egypt's Christians, who make up approximately 12% of the population. To make matters worse, right on the heels of al-Awwa's "monastery-conspiracy-theory," Islamist leaders began to circulate baseless rumors that the Church and Pope Shenouda III "kidnap" Coptic women, who willingly convert to Islam, and then trap the women in desert monasteries, "torturing" and "re-indoctrinating" them back to Christianity — even when the women in question publicly insist they never converted to Islam.
Due to all these allegations, since last month there have been at least ten mass demonstrations in Egypt — most numbering in the thousands — condemning the Copts, the Coptic Church, and Pope Shenouda. The "Front of Islamic Egypt" issued a statement promising the Copts a "bloodbath." Most recently, on October 8, Muslim demonstrators chanted "Shenouda, just wait, we will dig your grave with our own hands," while burning the 86 year-old pope's effigy.
At the very least, the usually intrusive Mubarak regime could have easily dispelled the absurd rumor that Coptic monks, among Egypt's most humble figures, were stockpiling weapons for an imaginary coup d'état in Egypt, by formally investigating and clearing the monasteries of the charge. The same intervention could also have aborted the ludicrous rumors that the Pope is kidnapping and torturing Coptic women who freely convert to Islam — an especially odd rumor, considering that the reverse is true: In Egypt, Christian women are regularly kidnapped and compelled to embrace Islam.
There appears to be no one to stop it — not even those most accountable: America's friend and ally, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and his government.
Worse, recent events indicate that the Mubarak regime is intentionally inciting Egypt's Muslims against the Copts.
To further exacerbate matters, on September 26, Al Azhar, a formal state body of Egypt, denounced a remark on Koran 5:17, which accuses Christians of being "infidels," made by a Coptic clergyman at an internal meeting on dogma, as "blasphemous." Moreover, it took this opportunity to state formally that citizenship rights in Egypt "are conditional on respect for the Islamic identity" of Egypt, thereby reversing any modern progress made regarding Egyptian equality, and reinforcing the Copts' historical role as dhimmis.. Pope Shenouda was further compelled to publicly apologize "if our Muslim brothers' feelings were hurt."
All this has been taking place in a nation where Christian and Jewish scriptures are systematically denounced as fabricated. Mere weeks earlier, a well known publishing house in Egypt issued a book dedicated to "proving" that Christians had forged the Bible. Such double standards are well entrenched: the Coptic clergyman had privately remarked on a Koranic verse, whereas the Egyptian government openly interferes with Christian doctrine, while preventing Muslims from converting to Christianity, in accordance to sharia's ridda, or apostasy, laws. For example, Mohammad Hegazy is one of many Egyptians who tried formally to change his religion from Muslim to Christian on his I.D. card —in Egypt, people are, Gestapo-like, categorized by their religion — only to be denied by the Egyptian court. (Many other such anecdotes abound.)
Considering the citizenship rights Copts enjoyed in the early-to-mid-20th century, how did things come to this pass? Much of this reversion can be traced to Mubarak's predecessor, Anwar Sadat, who altered Egypt's Constitution — by adding Article 2, "sharia is the principle source of legislation" — only to be rewarded, ironically, with assassination by the Islamist "Frankenstein monster" he had empowered. Since then, there has been a tacit agreement between the government and the Islamists. As Youssef Ibrahim puts it, the agreement "turned over to Islamists control in media, education, and government administrations in return for allowing Mr. Mubarak's rule to go on unchallenged, setting the stage … for his son, Gamal, to succeed him. As part of the deal, [Mubarak] agreed to feed Egypt's Christians to the growing Islamic beast."
The Copts now find themselves in a dire situation. Magdi Khalil, a human rights activist at the forefront of the "Coptic question," states that "Egypt is on the verge of chaos and change of regime, and there is a plan for Copts to pay the price of this predicted chaos, by directing the surplus violence, hate and barbarism towards them." This redirection onto the Copts is obvious even in subtle things: aside from the habitual anti-Copt indoctrination that goes on in mosques — all of the aforementioned demonstrations occurred immediately after Friday's mosque prayers — Egypt's state run public education system also marginalizes, if not ostracizes, the Copts (see, for example, Adel Guindy's "The Talibanization of Education in Egypt.")
More obvious proof of the government's complicity is the fact that, not only has it not prevented or dispersed the increasingly rabid demonstrations against the Copts — the way it viciously and unequivocally does whenever any protests are directed against itself — but Egyptian security, as Magdi Khalil affirmed in a phone conversation, actually facilitates, and sometimes participates, in these mass demonstrations. After all, Islamists who publicly call for the death of the Pope do so, writes Ibrahim Eissa, "knowing quite well that State Security will not touch them, since demonstrations are directed against the Pope and not the President, the Church and not the inheritance issue [Gamal Mubarak as successor of his father]. Those who go out in Jihad against 'inheritance,' democracy and election fraud are beaten mercilessly by security forces, but those who go out to incite sectarian violence between Muslims and Christians believe …that they are the friends and 'buddies' of the police and the State Security."
For centuries, the Copts — Egypt's Christian, indigenous inhabitants — have been subject to persecution, discrimination, humiliation, and over all subjugation in their homeland (etymologically, "Copt" simply means "Egyptian"). In the medieval era, such treatment was a standard aspect of sharia's dhimmi codes -- for dhimmis: conditionally tolerated religious minorities -- first ratified under Caliph Omar in the 7th century and based on Koran 9:29.
Conversely, during the colonial era and into the mid 20th century, as Egypt experimented with Westernization and nationalism, religious discrimination was markedly subdued. Today, however, as Egypt all but spearheads the Islamist movement — giving the world Sayyid Qutb, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Aymen Zawahiri in the process. As Egypt reverts to its medieval character, the Copts find themselves again in a period of severe persecution.
As history teaches, whenever a majority group casts all its woes onto a minority group, tragedy often follows. This is especially so when the majority group in question begins taking on an Islamist—that is, intolerant, violent, and medieval — character. Yet if Egypt's "secular" government and its U.S. ally are willing to sacrifice the Coptic scapegoat to appease the ever-burgeoning Islamist monster it has been nurturing for four decades, to whom can Egypt's Christians look for relief?
Raymond Ibrahim is associate director of the Middle East Forum, author of The Al Qaeda Reader, and guest lecturer at the National Defense Intelligence College.
Muslim Attack Injures 23 Coptic Christians
By Ethan Cole
Christian Post Reporter
Mar. 13 2010
Twenty-three Coptic Christians were injured by Muslim extremists Friday after an attack on a church community center, said an Egyptian Bishop.
The attack occurred after a sermon by a radical sheikh and lasted 10 hours before security forces put a stop to it, said Bishop Bejemy to The Associated Press on Saturday. The group of young Muslim men threw firebombs at the Coptic center and at nearby homes in Marsa Matruh, a seaport city in northern Egypt.
According to Egyptian officials, assailants were angry about a new fence erected around the center.
The attack on Copts in Marsa Matruh took place the same day the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom issued a statement condemning the Egyptian justice system for not prosecuting violence against Copts.
An Egyptian judge recently acquitted four Muslim men of the murder of a Coptic man. USCIRF called it “the latest example in a growing pattern of instances where individuals have not been brought to justice after committing violent acts against Christians and their property.”
Coptic Christian Farouk Attallah was murdered on Oct. 19, 2009. Attallah’s Christian son was involved in a romantic relationship with a Muslim girl. The Muslim men planned to murder the son, but when they could not find him they killed his father. Despite reported witnesses, the court said there was insufficient evidence and acquitted the men.
“This is one of more than a dozen incidents USCIRF has followed in the last year or so in which Coptic Christians have been the targets of violence,” said USCIRF Chair Leonard Leo, who led a USCIRF fact-finding delegation to Egypt in January. “This upsurge in violence and the failure to prosecute those responsible fosters a growing climate of impunity."
“We call on the government to appeal the verdict in the Attallah murder and bring the perpetrators to justice,” Leo said.
Since 2002, Egypt has been on the USCIRF “Watch List” for its serious religious freedom violations, including widespread problems of discrimination, intolerance, and other human rights violations against members of religious minorities.
According to Egypt’s constitution, Islam is the “religion of the state” and the country’s “principle source of legislation.”
Coptic Christians, who make up about 10 percent of Egypt’s population, complain that they are discriminated against in all aspects of social life, from education to government representation. They also voice grievance over the law that requires them to have high-level government permission in order to repair or rebuild churches. Even though they make such requests for permission, Christians are rarely, if ever, granted the right to repair or build churches. Muslims, however, are allowed to freely build mosques without such government permission.
Fragile Muslim-Christian peace crumbles in Egypt
29 September 2008
By Jack Shenker in Cairo
News.scotsman.com
IN THE shadows of the Moqattam cliffs that tower over Cairo's eastern fringes, Safwat Nazeem is picking his way through tens of thousands of empty plastic bottles.
Safwat, like his father
before him, is one of the Zabaleen, Egypt's invisible army of refuse collectors
who gather the urban waste around them and welcome it into their homes. Their
neighbourhood, known as Garbage City, overflows with rubbish all waiting to be
sifted and recycled. And after a recent spate of national violence and media
intrigue, the Zabaleen have become a community on the defensive.
Like the vast majority of Garbage City's residents, Safwat is a Coptic Christian
– part of an eight million-strong religious minority in Egypt that predates the
presence of Islam in the country by over 500 years.
In the past months, the country's fragile sectarian balance has been rocked by
violent clashes, accusations of discrimination on both sides and rumours of
"special interests" spreading disruption from abroad.
In late May, four Christians were gunned down in a Cairene jewellery shop. The
government dismissed it as a robbery, neglecting to explain why nothing was
taken. Pope Shenouda, the ageing patriarch of the Coptic Church, opted to stay
quiet and maintained his silence even when a similar attack took place on a
Coptic jeweller in Alexandria a few days later.
But he was forced to speak out on 31 May when a serene Coptic outpost, the
1,700-year-old monastery of Abo Fana, was besieged by dozens of Muslims
following a land dispute with local farmers. Although the Abo Fana controversy
occurred 300 miles south of the Egyptian capital, its impact was felt throughout
the country.
Copts have consistently complained that archaic building regulations hamper the
repair or expansion of their churches, strangling the ancient faith with
bureaucracy. They also claim they are denied access to key positions in
government because of their religion.
Muslim commentators have argued that most Copts are better off than their Muslim
counterparts, and that the Christian faithful are being manipulated by external
forces using the guise of "minority rights" to interfere with Egypt's internal
affairs. Critics on both sides of the divide agree that the potential for
sectarian violence is growing.
Safwat shares the fears of many Christians that the changing political landscape
in Egypt is threatening his way of life.
Glancing up at a figurine of the Virgin Mary, he sighs: "Islam is the solution
is their slogan. But there is no place for Christians in that, no place for
anyone else."
Europeans kidnapped in Egyptian desert near Sudan
By SARAH EL DEEB – 2008
CAIRO, Egypt (AP) — Kidnappers have seized 11 European tourists and eight Egyptians during a Sahara desert safari to Gilf al-Kebir, a plateau famed for its prehistoric cave paintings, Egyptian officials said Monday.
Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said in New York that the group had been freed unharmed Monday, and a military official confirmed their release. But Egyptian officials in Cairo and New York later said they had not yet been freed and Aboul Gheit's announcement to reporters that they had been let go was based on incorrect information.
The five Germans, five Italians and one Romanian were seized Friday along with their Egyptian guides and drivers while camping near the Sudanese border, Egyptian Tourism Minister Zoheir Garana said before the release was announced. The kidnappers took the captives, including two Italians in their 70s, into Sudan, he said.
Only a few intrepid visitors make the daunting trek of more than a week in 4X4s across the desert to the Gilf al-Kebir, which lies near Egypt's borders with Libya and Sudan beyond a vast plain of dunes known as the Great Sand Sea. It is one of the most arid places on Earth.
The plateau has become increasingly popular among adventure and eco-tourists drawn by the stark desert landscapes and the prehistoric paintings in caves that dot the plateau. They include the "Cave of the Swimmers," immortalized in the 1996 movie "The English Patient." The cave features 10,000-year-old paintings of people swimming, a hallmark of a time when scientists believe parts of the Sahara were covered by lakes and rivers.
The unpopulated region is a crossroads for ethnic African tribesmen — including smugglers — from Libya, Sudan and even Chad, further south. It borders Sudan's Darfur region, where raging conflicts have given rise to armed bandits who have become notorious for robberies and hijackings.
Ismail Khairat, a spokesman for Egypt's U.N. mission, said the tourists have not been released. The information that Aboul Gheit relied on when he announced their release earlier "was based on primary information and it was not correct," Khairat said.
"They are not yet released so far and the government is doing their best to release them," he told The Associated Press.
Rady said the abduction was not connected to Islamic militants, who have previously attacked tourists in southern Egypt and the Sinai Peninsula. "This is a criminal act. They are seeking a ransom," he said.
Garana said the tour company that organized the trip negotiated with the kidnappers, who demanded up to $6 million in ransom. He said the German government was involved in the talks but the Egyptian government was not. Germany's Foreign Ministry said only that it had formed a "crisis team" on the abduction.
The kidnapping was only discovered because the Egyptian owner of the tour company, who was on the trip, was able to call his German wife by mobile phone, Garana told state television. The group included eight Egyptians, he said.
The tour owner told his wife that a group of armed men, who appeared "African," drove up to the group while they were setting up their tents, an Egyptian security official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to talk to the media. It was not clear when that phone call took place.
Italy's Foreign Ministry said the owner called his wife in Cairo again on Monday night and told her their captors had taken the group to Sudan.
The kidnapped Italians included three women and two men from the Turin area, Italy's ANSA news agency said. Two of the Italian tourists were in their 70s and one was 68 years old, said Italy's RAI state TV.
A tour guide who operates in the area said colleagues in the Western Desert told him the kidnappers were tribesmen. Mohammed Marzouk said there have been previous robberies in the area, most recently in May, when tribesmen seized two tour company SUVs during a desert trip.
Tourism is Egypt's biggest foreign currency earner. The industry was devastated in the 1990s when Islamic militants waged a campaign of violence, including attacks on tourists. The campaign was suppressed in a fierce crackdown by the government of President Hosni Mubarak and the industry has since been rebuilt.
Since 2004, attacks on foreigners shifted to the beach resorts of the Sinai peninsula in northeastern Egypt, with a total of 121 people, including tourists, killed in a series of bombings.
But there have been no major attacks in the capital, Cairo — home of the Pyramids — or the main antiquities sites in the south in more than a decade. There have been no known Islamic militant attacks in Egypt's Western Desert, where the Gilf al-Kabir is located.
The Gilf al-Kabir, some 550 miles southwest of Cairo, is one of the last frontiers in Egypt, explored by a few Egyptian and European expeditions in the early 20th Century. The Cave of the Swimmers was discovered in a niche in the cliff face in 1933 by Hungarian explorer Laslo Almasy. Since then, the Gilf has largely been ignored until it gained the recent notice of adventure travelers.
The Gilf is a giant limestone and sandstone plateau — bigger than Delaware or the island of Cyprus and nearly 1,000 feet high at some points. It is separated from the rest of Egypt by a vast sea of sand dunes.
The plateau is creased with wadis, or dry river valleys, producing dramatic landscapes of dunes washing up against high black cliff faces. The wadis are pockmarked with caves holding one of the richest troves of Neolithic cave art in Africa. Rock faces are covered with red and black paintings of lions, gazelles, bullocks, giraffes and people hunting, as well as silhouettes of hands. Tour guides still boast of discovering new cave paintings.
Tourists are required to get permits from the military to visit the site and must travel in tour groups with at least one security guard. The tour, done in desert 4X4s, can take more than 12 days.
But, as in other places, expanding adventure tourism may be moving closer to zones of instability. Earlier this year, the annual Dakar Rally through the Western Sahara was canceled because of al-Qaida threats of attacks.
Associated Press reporters Paul Schemm and Katarina Kratovac in Cairo and John Heilprin at the United Nations contributed to this report.
Violence mars Egyptian referendum
Demonstrators opposing 'sham' referendum
beaten by pro-Mubarak supporters
Compiled by Daily Star staff
May 26, 2005
CAIRO: Plain clothes supporters of Egyptian President hosni Mubarak beat up groups of anti Mubarak demonstrators as voting in a national referendum was expected to clear the way for Egypt's first multi-candidate presidential elections. Critics consider the referendum a sham, saying the rules being laid down ensure Mubarak will have no serious challengers and that his ruling National Democratic Party won't lose its grip on power. The measure was expected to pass easily.
Several opposition groups called a boycott of the vote, and some organized demonstrations. One was canceled amid heavy security and warnings that protests would not be tolerated.
But scattered anti-Mubarak demonstrations took place in defiance of the warnings, some on the margins of pro-Mubarak street rallies, with scattered reports of violence. Many gatherings were broken up by force.
In one, more than a dozen members of the anti-Mubarak movement Kefaya, or "Enough" were beaten by pro-Mubarak gangs. The protesters tried to seek police protection but a high-ranking officer ordered lawmen to withdraw and allowed the attackers to set upon the demonstrators.
Elsewhere, 150 pro-Mubarak protesters attacked Kefaya members, belting them with wooden sticks used to hold Mubarak banners. Demonstrators scattered, with some taking refuge inside the press syndicate building.
Another clash occurred when demonstrators placed Kefaya stickers onto placards emblazoned with Mubarak's face and waved them in the air, chanting: "Leave, leave Mubarak." Plainclothes state security investigators were beating, groping and verbally harassing demonstrators, particularly women.
About a dozen people, mostly women, were violently cornered and surrounded by nightstick-toting plainclothes police. Some began beating demonstrators.
A senior government official said he was "dismayed" by reports of violence, but said there was no intentional harassment of protesters. He asked not to be identified.
Kefaya spokesman Abdel-Halim Qandil said two Kefaya members were hurt; it wasn't clear how badly. Police said 10 demonstrators were arrested.
"This is the first time this sort of beating and humiliation has taken place here in Cairo," Qandil said, but added it has been a problem in provincial areas away from the media.
At polling stations, "no" voters were hard to find, but it wasn't clear whether their absence was due to boycott calls or lack of interest in a measure sure to pass. Many supporters of the measure weren't clear what they were agreeing to.
"Of course I would say yes, because the president is so committed to serving us that he doesn't sleep," said Mohammad Ahmad, a 42-year-old shopkeeper.
Outside Cairo, there were reports of light turnout with many voters saying they were urged to vote or suffer penalties.
"I voted to avoid any government penalty," said Ahmad Hussain Mohammad, a government worker in Sohag, 390 kilometers south of Cairo, who said his colleagues told him that he would be fined if he didn't cast a ballot.
Mubarak has led Egypt since soon after President Anwar Sadat was assassinated in 1981, reinstalled every six years in the yes-no, single-candidate referendums he is asking the Constitution to end. Mubarak hasn't formally announced he will run again but is widely expected to do so.
Egypt's opposition leaders are known in certain circles, but except for the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood, are relatively unknown to most Egyptians. The Brotherhood, the country's oldest and largest Islamic movement, is believed to have hundreds of thousands of supporters nationwide.
The Interior Ministry has said about 32.5
million registered citizens were expected to vote. Results are expected today.
Egypt's semiofficial Middle East News Agency said preliminary results may be
available later Wednesday. - AP
Deaths increase in Egypt bombings
Official arrest 35, but their links to blasts remain unclear.
By GREG MYRE and MONA EL-NAGGAR
The New York Times
Sunday, July 24, 2005
SHARM EL-SHEIK, EGYPT – The death toll from three bombs at this Red Sea resort rose sharply Saturday. Egyptian authorities said at least 90 people had been killed in an attack strikingly similar to one that tore apart resorts farther up the coast of the Sinai peninsula nine months ago.
The latest attacks, the worst in Egypt, ripped through an upscale hotel, a local market and a parking lot beginning shortly after 1 a.m., a synchronized series of blasts that witnesses and authorities said had occurred about five minutes apart.
Citing police officials, Reuters reported that 35 people had been arrested Saturday, though it was not clear if they were suspected of close ties to the bombers or whether it was part of a general roundup.
Egypt's interior minister, Habib el-Adly, who visited the blast sites on Saturday, said those behind the October explosions in Taba "could be linked" to the ones here.
Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak visited the injured in a hospital, and later addressed the nation on television, vowing to track down those responsible. World leaders quickly condemned the bombings.
"This cowardly, criminal act is aimed at undermining Egypt's security and stability and harming its people and its guests," Mubarak said. "This will only increase our determination in chasing terrorism."
The dead and injured included significant numbers of European tourists and Egyptians, with at least 240 people injured, said Essam Sharif, director of emergency medicine in Sharm el-Sheik. The foreign casualties included Spaniards, British, French, Italians, Qataris and Kuwaitis.
The first of the three explosions Saturday was apparently set off by a suicide bomber in a car on a street between the town's Old Market and a new shopping center, killing several people.
The second and worst of the bombings took place along the main strip of beachfront hotels when a bomber drove a small truck through a plate glass window and into the lobby of the Ghazala Gardens hotel. The entrance of the two-story building was reduced to rubble.
The third and least damaging of the bombs exploded in a bag in a parking lot where there were relatively few people. Sharm el-Sheik hosts many tourists this time of year, but the bombing sites were less than packed because of the late hour.
The bombings come about nine months after the attacks in Taba and Nuweiba, north of Sharm, and just south of Israel's border, which also included three closely timed explosions.
Those bombs were aimed at popular sites for vacationing Israelis - among the only places in the Arab world where Israeli tourists traveled in large numbers. Egypt allowed Israeli ambulances and military units to cross the border at Taba to help with the rescue and forensic efforts.
While Saturday's bombings were similar in style, the target was somewhat different. The bombers attacked the largest resort city in a country that is heavily dependent on tourists from Europe and other Arab nations. The attacks could scare away visitors as happened in the 1990s with a previous round of terrorism.
The White House issued a statement saying that "the United States condemns in the strongest possible terms the barbaric terrorist attacks in Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt, that killed and injured scores of innocent civilians from many nations and religious faiths."
The statement said that President George W. Bush spoke with Mubarak on Saturday and offered his personal condolences and the support of the American people.
Egypt and Mubarak have been fiercely criticized by al-Qaida and its adherents for supporting American policy, as well as for its peace treaty with Israel. Egypt has also tried to crush or severely restrict Islamic political movements.
Egypt city tense after violence
By Michael
Slackman
The New York Times
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2005
ALEXANDRIA, Egypt Riot police forces armed with shotguns guarded a Coptic Christian church here over the weekend after Muslim protesters tried to storm the building in a demonstration that was broken up when security forces fired tear gas and rubber bullets into the crowd.
Three people were killed and many more wounded Friday in what officials called the worst case of sectarian violence to strike this Mediterranean city in recent memory.
Thousands of demonstrators took to the streets Friday, apparently angry over a play that was performed two years ago in the church and that was recently distributed on videodisc.
Although few people interviewed Saturday said they actually had seen the play or the DVD, the word on the street was it was anti-Islamic.
The streets remained tense Saturday, and many people warned that foreigners were not welcome. The mood in the city was sour and explosive.
"People are very, very provoked," said Ahmed Ali Mahmoud, 25, a pharmacist whose shop is opposite St. George's Coptic Church. "They are boiling."
While relations between faiths are often tolerant, if tense, in Egypt, there have been signs recently of growing strain between Egypt's Coptic Christians and Muslims.
It was unclear who was giving out the DVD, and church officials, as well as local residents, speculated that its distribution might somehow be connected to the coming parliamentary elections, where aggravated sectarian tensions could help certain candidates.
"We believe that this problem was raised in light of the coming parliamentary elections," a church statement said.
Alexandria, an ancient city founded by Alexander the Great, two hours north of Cairo, is home to one of the country's larger Coptic communities.
Of Egypt's 74 million people, more than 90 percent are Muslim, mostly Sunnis, and about 8 percent to 10 percent are Christian, mostly Copts.
Islam is the official state religion, and all legislation is supposed to be based on the Islamic code.
U.S. prods Egypt to clean up election after violence Tue Nov 29, 2005
By Saul Hudson
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States urged Egypt on Monday to clean up its elections, which have been marred by accusations of fraud, voter intimidation and a crackdown on the main Islamist opposition group.
The United States has this year prodded one of its closest allies in the Middle East to improve its democratic record despite some U.S. and Egyptian fears it could destabilize the Arab world's largest country.
The United States has raised its concerns over the parliamentary election, which has been held over several days and will end next month, and asked the government of longtime leader President Hosni Mubarak to allow people to vote freely.
"We would urge the government of Egypt to provide an atmosphere during this election process in which the Egyptian people, all the Egyptian people, can express their will through the ballot box and not fear violence, not fear intimidation by any group," State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.
Egyptian police arrested nearly 200 Muslim Brotherhood activists on Monday in a crackdown on the Islamist opposition group.
McCormack cited as "sources of real concern" reports that security forces have barred some voters from casting their ballots and that election monitors have been threatened and hampered from observing polling stations.
The criticism effectively put the Bush administration in the unusual position of defending the rights of the Muslim Brotherhood, the Islamist group that has increased its seats five-fold by fielding candidates as independents.
President George W. Bush vowed this year to make democracy central to U.S. ties in the Middle East and called on Mubarak to lead reforms in the region.
DEMOCRACY DRIVE BENEFITS BROTHERHOOD
But Egypt's parliamentary voting so far has bolstered the view that free and fair elections could empower Islamist parties hostile to U.S. policies in several Middle Eastern countries.
And, while a change in tone has been evident in public statements from the Bush administration this year, critics complain it has held back from demanding quicker reforms in Egypt because of such fears.
Although the Muslim Brotherhood is clearly the strongest opposition force in the country, the United States distances itself from the group to avoid angering Mubarak and supports his refusal to recognize the Muslim Brotherhood as a party.
In keeping with that diplomacy, McCormack did not condemn the arrests on Monday of the activists from the Muslim Brotherhood, which wants greater political freedoms in Egypt and said the arrests were designed to weaken its chances in this week's voting.
But the Brotherhood has benefited from U.S. calls for change, which have helped to open debate in Egypt and emboldened civil society groups to monitor elections much more closely.
And McCormack seemed to welcome their election showing.
"We note that there have been a number of independent candidates that have won seats," he said. "It's important in any democratic process -- for any healthy, vibrant, growing democracy -- that the results of an election reflect the will of the people."
BY SALLY BUZBEE
ASSOCIATED PRESS
November 28, 2005
CAIRO, Egypt -- For months, the Bush administration has said that it is serious about pushing for democracy in the Middle East. It's about to get a serious test of that resolve.
Egypt, the world's most populous Arab country, is suddenly roiling with a wide-open, combative election that seems certain to end with the country's main Islamic group, the banned Muslim Brotherhood, as a big winner.
The country's rulers, longtime U.S. allies, are starting to show signs of panic: Police have barred voters from polls, and thugs have attacked Brotherhood supporters in recent days in an apparent effort to blunt the group's growing momentum.
The final round of voting is Thursday, but Brotherhood loyalists -- who run as independents -- have already increased their seats in parliament fivefold. That's not enough to unseat the ruling party, but is still seen as a slap to President Hosni Mubarak.
In some ways, despite the violence, the process is going as well as President George W. Bush could hope. Nine months after Mubarak took the first steps toward reform under U.S. pressure, it is indisputably clear that Egyptians hanker for choice and change.
Yet two things about the election could prove deeply worrisome for the West:
· One is the Brotherhood itself, and what it might do now that it has gained enough power to influence government policy in a secular system it opposes.
· The second is the turmoil Egypt likely would face during any transition, as Mubarak and his long-ruling elite struggle to decide whether to give up power, and if so, how much and how fast.
Even though Bush says it was hypocritical for the United States to forgo pressing democratic reform on authoritarian regimes such as those in Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia in return for support on other issues, Washington still needs a few Arab allies at a time when Al Qaeda loyalists are active, Iran is increasingly combative toward Israel and Iraq continues to be bloody.
A chaotic Egyptian government, torn by infighting, would be bad for the United States, as it would be unable or unwilling to help with Arab-Israeli peace or Iraqi reconciliation. Yet a U.S. retreat on democracy would reinforce the view of many Arabs who are suspicious of American motives.
So far, the Bush administration has stressed that it just wants a free and fair vote.
Still, there is American discomfort with the Brotherhood, a group that will almost certainly be less accommodating than Mubarak on issues involving Israel.
Some worry the Brotherhood's more-moderate stance -- it renounced violence in the 1970s and says it wants to create an Islamic nation through peaceful means -- is just a smoke screen.
In reality, many Egyptians who voted for the Brotherhood did so not because they want an Islamic government but to protest a Mubarak regime seen as widely corrupt.
Riots throw spotlight on a changing Egypt
Sectarian tension remains high in
Egypt just a few days after widespread riots rocked the country. The deadly
religious violence has pitted Christian and Muslim protesters against each
other. The unrest has thrown the spotlight on the country, exposing deeper
changes taking place there, not least with regards to the role of women in
Egyptian society. Analysts, for example, say an increasing number of Muslim
students are wearing veils.
"I wear the veil to be in accordance with my religion, to protect myself before
God," said one student at the University of Cairo. Fighting for more rights is
the New Woman Foundation, which says it has been subject to pressure from the
police. According to the founder, Nawla Darwiche, women are denied a place in
politics and the veil represents religious oppression.
She said: "It's a way of controlling a woman's body. It's like a chastity belt
in the middle ages. It's like female circumcision which still exists in Egypt."
However, other women, who belong to a group called Muslim Brotherhood, insist
the veil has its place. Member Makarem Al Deiri was the only female Muslim
candidate in the last elections.
She said: "We must enforce religious values at the heart of each family because
this prevents youth delinquency and helps with their education." Georgette Sohbi
belongs to the Coptic Christian minority in Egypt. She is one of only 10 women
in parliament, nominated by President Mubarak.
She said: "If the Muslim Brotherhood takes power, they'll change the country's
laws. I think there'd be violence between Coptic Christians and Muslims. Coptics
refuse to be treated like second class citizens, without any rights." With
regard to the country's future direction, observers say the role of religion is
becoming increasingly important, especially with each side convinced they know
which path is best.
A Study by the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center at the Center for Special Studies:
29 October 2006
Overview
Between December 21 and 31, 2005, the 17 th International Book Fair was held in Doha , Qatar , under the auspices of the Qatari ruler, sponsored by the National Council for Culture, Arts and Heritage of Qatar. Three hundred and fifty publishers from 17 Arab and Muslim countries had booths exhibiting over 65,000 titles in Arabic and foreign languages, some of it anti-Semitic literature published in Arab countries. Prominent in the anti-Semitic field were Syria, Lebanon and Egypt.
This follow-up Bulletin surveys a selection of anti-Semitic books published in Egypt between 2000 and 2006 and sold at the international book fair in Qatar . It includes information about the authors and publishers. Some of the publishing houses are large and well-known , which lends the literature an air of respectability .
The books published in Egypt include anti-Semitic texts which reflect great hostility toward Israel, the Jewish people and the West, and in effect justify the use of violence against them. The main themes appearing in the books are:
The Jews are responsible for all the ills of the world. They distribute drugs and pornographic movies, finance houses of prostitution and encourage corruption.
Without a doubt, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion are authentic and reflect the Jewish plot to take over the world. The Jews aspire to cause global crises, take over international finance and harness the media to serve their needs.
Denial of the Holocaust, or minimizing it and reducing its importance while comparing it to the so-called Israeli “holocaust” against the Palestinians. The books claim that the Nazis did not kill six million Jews, there were no crematoria and the Jews invented the “Holocaust lie” to extort money from European countries.
The use of early Islamic traditions to “prove” that the Jews have always betrayed and plotted against the Arabs (comparing, for instance, the security fence being built by Israel for the prevention of terrorist attacks to the fence the Khaybar Jews built, who according to Muslim tradition betrayed the prophet Muhammad and were expelled from their dwelling places).
The West has only contempt for Islam and Muslims . As an example one of the books states that during the Crusades poems and stories were written slandering Islam and Muslims, including horror stories about the Christian Crusaders’ eating the flesh of their Muslim victims.
During the Second World War the liberal West was as guilty of war crimes as Hitler . The United States, which boasts of being a democracy, encourages terrorism, racism and the dictatorships of the world.
The contents of the books express anti-Semitism with principally Western sources, inspired particularly by The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. At the same time anti-Semitism based on Islamic sources is also present, although to a lesser degree. In addition, some of the authors are high-placed PhDs, which makes the literature more “respectable” because they are often interviewed by the Arab media and some of them are often quoted by the Arab Internet news sites. However, some of them are unknown and apparently some of them use pen names.
Making such literature available at the Doha International Book Fair clearly illustrates that Egypt continues as a center for the widespread distribution of hate literature in the Arab-Muslim world despite its peace treaty with Israel . 2 The Egyptian regime would seem to apply rigorous standards of censorship to subjects concerning its own internal security but avoids taking effective steps when the issue is incitement against Israel , the Jews and the liberal West.
Egypt Blogger Begins Prison Sentence For "Insulting" Islam ; Christians Attacked
Journal Chretien
February 27, 2007
CAIRO, EGYPT — A young Egyptian blogger who criticized Muslim violence against Coptic Christians was behind bars Friday, February 23, after being sentenced to four years imprisonment for "insulting" Islam, "inciting sectarian strife" and "defaming" President Hosni Mubarak with his Internet writings.
Abdel Kareem Nabil, a 22-year-old former student at Egypt’s Al-Azhar University, had been a vocal secularist and sharp critic of radical Muslims in his blog. Nabil, who used the blogger name Kareem Amer, often lashed out at Al-Azhar - the most prominent religious center in Sunni Islam - calling it "the university of terrorism" and accusing it of encouraging extremism.
Judge Ayman al-Akazi of a court in the city of Alexandria sentenced Nabil to three years in prison for "insulting Islam and the Prophet Muhammad" and "inciting sectarian strife" and another year for "insulting President" Mubarak.
He said Nabil insulted the Prophet Muhammad especially with a piece he wrote in 2005 after riots in which angry Muslim worshippers attacked a Coptic Christian church over a play deemed offensive to Islam.
"UGLY FACE"
"Muslims revealed their true ugly face and appeared to all the world that they are full of brutality, barbarism and inhumanity," Nabil wrote at the time. He called Muhammad and his 7th century followers, the Sahaba, "spillers of blood" for their teachings on warfare - a comment cited by the judge. However court observers also noted that the judge overlooked Nabil’s clarification of the comments. He said Muhammad was "great" but that his teachings on warfare and other issues should be viewed as a product of their times.
In other writings, he reportedly called Al-Azhar the "other face of the coin of [terror network] al-Qaida" and called for the university to be dissolved or turned into a secular institution. He also criticized President Mubarak, calling him "the symbol of tyranny."
Nabil’s lawyer, Ahmed Seif el-Islam, said he would appeal the verdict. He and human rights groups also warned that the sentencing could have "a negative impact on freedom of expression" in Egypt. "This sentence is yet another slap in the face of freedom of expression in Egypt," said Hassiba Hadj Sahraoui, Middle East and North Africa Deputy Program Director of human rights group Amnesty International (AI) in a statement to BosNewsLife.
"The Egyptian authorities must protect the peaceful exercise of freedom of expression, even if the views expressed might be perceived by some as offensive." The official said AI considers the blogger "a prisoner of conscience who is being prosecuted on account of the peaceful expression" of his views. AI urged Egypt to "repeal legislation that, in violation of international standards, stipulates prison sentences for acts which constitute nothing more than the peaceful exercise of the rights of freedom of expression, thought, conscience and religion."
"SLAP AND SCREAM"
Nabil, sitting in the defendant’s pen, did not react as the verdict was read and made no comments as he was led to a prison truck outside, eyewitnesses said. Seconds after the door was closed, an Associated Press agency reporter claimed to have heard "a slap from inside the truck and a scream."
Last year another Internet writer, Hala Helmy Botros, was forced to close down her blog Aqbat Bela Hodood, or ’Copts Without Borders’ about the plight of Copts and to stop writing on this subject for other websites. Botros, who is in her 40s, wrote under the pseudonym of Hala El-Masry and became the target of a judicial investigation and was banned from leaving the country, BosNewsLife learned.
Thursday’s sentencing of Nabil came amid growing religious tensions between Muslims and minority Christians in Egypt. This month police reportedly detained Christian families in Upper Egypt and forced them to deny arson attacks on their homes during a spate of anti-Christian violence last week.
Two Coptic Orthodox families said police detained them for 36 hours when they attempted to report a February 13 assault on their homes in Armant, 600 kilometers (373 miles) south of Cairo. The fires came five days after Muslim groups set four Christian-owned shops alight on February 9.
International media said reports of a love affair between a Christian man and Muslim woman sparked the violence, but local media said hostilities broke out over accusations that Christians were blackmailing Muslim women to convert.
Law ends Christian/Muslim organ donation
Hamdi Al Sayed of the Egyptian Medical Association denies that a proposed law would prohibit organ donation between Muslims and non-Muslims. Critics fear further anti-Christian discrimination and violence.
Tuesday, August 19, 2008
The Egyptian
Medical Association, through its spokesman on August 18, denied that a bill in
the Egyptian parliament would discriminate between Christians and
Muslims by prohibiting organ transplants between members of the two faiths.
The Association supports the controversial measure. “This is all to protect poor
Muslims from rich Christians who buy their organs and vice versa,” explained
Hamdi Al Sayed – the director of the Medical Association. Under the bill,
physicians who violate the proposed law would face retribution.
Al Sayed denied any sectarianism in the proposed law saying that “if some Copts
are angered by the law then why is it that Muslims are not.” Even so, Al Sayed
said that under the draft law, it’s not possible for a Coptic Christian to
donate organs to a Muslim and vice versa simply because donations have been
restricted to family members up to the fourth degree. Al Sayed continued “…it is
degrading for both religions if lets say, a poor Christian has to sell his
kidney to a rich Muslim, or a poor Muslim has to sell his kidney to a rich
Christian. It is not right for either religion and that is why we made this law
so we can stop organ trafficking.” Finally, Al Sayed continued, “It is not about
trying to promote differences between religions but it’s just to minimize the
trade of organs as much as we can.”
Speaking for Coptic Christians, Bishop Marcos said “We all have the same
Egyptian blood, but if the reason for the measure is to end organ trafficking,
we reject it because it may also occur between believers of the same religion.”
For Bishop Marcos, the Association’s decision is “very grave” since it can lead
to prohibiting blood donation between Christians and Muslims or prevent
physicians from examining patients of religions other than their own. “We are
afraid that in the future there will be hospitals for Christians and hospitals
for Muslims,” said the bishop. Egyptian Christians currently make up
approximately 10% of the nation as a whole, which has a population of more than
76 million.
Some Muslims have spoken against the move by the Medical Association. According
to Abel Moti Bayumi, of the prestigious Al Azhar Center for
Islamic Studies, the prohibition “could lead to discrimination between a
Muslim and a Christian living in the same country.” Also, Sheikh Gamal Kotb -
former Chairman of the Fatwa Committee – was quoted as saying that there is
nothing in Islam that prevents Muslims from receiving or donating an organ
transplant from either Muslim or non- Muslim.
For its part, the
Egyptian Human Rights Union has brought suit before a court in Cairo against
the physicians. Naguib Gibrael of the Human Rights Union believes that the
measure “is discriminatory, since it violates human rights, the Constitution,
and national unity.” Gibrael denounced
the Muslim Brotherhood and its “strong Islamist control over the Medical
Association.” Said Gibrael,”If the Medical Association does not annul the
measure, there will be more conflict between Muslims and Christians.” The Muslim
Brotherhood is the main opposition party in Egypt, which has been linked to
Islamist movements worldwide.
During the 1990s,
Egypt witnessed a wave of anti-Christian and anti-Western violence led by
Islamist groups such as Gamaa Al Islamiya and Islamic Jihad which reaped a toll
of some 1,300 people – many of them
Coptic Christians – mostly in the southern part of the country. There have
been more recent anti-Christian attacks: in June 2008, a monastery in Abu Fana
was attacked and burned by Muslims, causing serious injuries to seven monks.
There has been a notable rift between prominent Muslim clerics in Egypt over
organ donation. In 2007, the Grand Sheik of Al Azhar, Mohammed Sayed Tantawi,
the leader of the most important center of learning in Sunni Islam, announced
his willingness to donate his organs upon his death. This was contrary to the
stated position of the Muslim cleric Sheik Mohammed Metwali al-Sharawi. Metawali
Al-Sharawi has a popular television program on which he declared that since
human organs are a gift from God, they should be neither donated nor replaced by
Muslim believers.
There is an acute shortage of human organs donated in Egypt, prompting a lively
black market. Concern has been expressed by the Egyptian Medical Association and
others about “transplant tourists” – foreigners coming to Egyptian seeking
transplants who may encourage the trafficking of human organs. In the 1990s, the
association moved to limit or eliminate kidney transplant surgery for foreigners
coming to Egypt. For Al Sayed of the Egyptian Medical Association, the intention
of the proposed law is the elimination of organ trafficking. “If organ donations
are from the third or fourth degree of the family then there is less of a chance
of a trade happening as it’s not likely that family members will sell organs to
each other,” said Al Sayed.
“Egypt is different from other places,” said Al Sayed. “No one really comes up
and says they want to donate their organs to other people who are not in their
family. This happens in the West but in Egypt it is mostly the poor people who
are desperate and end up selling their organs for money.”
Martin Barillas is a former US diplomat, who also worked as a democracy advocate and election observer in Latin America.